|
USA: Two Florida school
officials facing possible jail terms for praying in the
presence of students are getting the support of more
than 60 members of Congress. Some of those members, who
signed a letter of support and sent it to the two school
officials on September 14, 2009, took to the House floor
later to denounce what they called a “criminalization of
prayer” that “tramples on the First Amendment rights” of
Christians.
“The Founding Fathers would be appalled” at the trial of
Pace High School Principal Frank Lay and his school
athletic director, Robert Freeman, said Rep. Jeff Miller
of Florida. His Pensacola-based district includes Santa
Rosa County, where the lawsuit is based. The 9 a.m.
trial “is one of the first times we’ve literally had the
potential for the criminalization of prayer in the
United States of America,” said Rep. J. Randy Forbes of
Virginia, chairman of the Congressional Prayer Caucus.
If the two men are found guilty, “there will come a
day,” Mr. Forbes predicted, “when the speaker of this
house will be hauled into federal court and threatened
with jail because she dares to stand at that podium
where you stand tonight and ask the chaplain to start
our day with the prayer.”
Mr. Forbes, Mr. Miller and Rep. Mike McIntyre, North
Carolina Democrat, were signatories to the letter to the
two educators, assuring them that “we are standing with
you in prayer and support as you face your trial.” More
than 60 members of the House have co-signed. The two
educators are being tried in federal district court in
Pensacola for breaching the conditions of a lawsuit
settlement reached last year with the American Civil
Liberties Union.
The ACLU sued Santa Rosa County School District a year
ago on behalf of two students who claimed that some
teachers and administrators were allowing prayers at
school events, orchestrating separate religiously themed
graduation services and proselytizing students during
class and after school.
In January, the school district settled out of court
with the ACLU, agreeing to several conditions, including
the barring of all school employees from promoting or
sponsoring prayers during school-sponsored events.
The ACLU complained to U.S. District Judge Margaret C.
“Casey” Rodgers after Mr. Lay asked Mr. Freeman to offer
mealtime prayers at a January 28, 2009 lunch for school
employees and booster-club members who had helped with a
school field-house project. The judge then issued a
contempt order for the two men.
Mr. Miller criticized the order, saying, “a federal
judge has gone well outside the bounds of the
Constitution to declare that prayer offered among adults
is illegal.” There was “zero student participation” at
the event, he said. “That the court would somehow
consider this action to be criminal behaviour is simply
unconscionable.”
The judge’s injunction “tramples upon the First
Amendment rights of a specific group of people,” Mr.
Miller added, “denying them the equal protection that is
provided under the very Constitution that we believe
in.”
The contempt order had also included Michelle Winkler, a
clerical assistant who asked her husband, who is not a
school employee, to bless an evening meal at a private
event in February at a nearby naval base with other
school employees. After a 7 1/2-hour trial on August 21,
2009 the judge removed Mrs. Winkler’s name from the
order.
Susan Watson, the Northwest regional director for the
ACLU’s Florida affiliate, said she had not seen the
letter from the House members, so she had no comment.
Glenn Katon, director of the Florida ACLU’s religious
freedom project, called the letter “political
grandstanding.”
|