|
New York, Mar. 12,
2010: A legal group on Thursday filed a petition
requesting the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case of
a kindergarten student’s poster that was censored by a
school because it contained the image of Jesus.
Liberty Counsel, which represents the student Antonio
Peck, argues that the latest decision by a district
court judge to dismiss Antonio’s claim conflicts with
the Supreme Court’s precedent regarding a student’s
right to challenge the actions of school officials.
The Supreme Court precedent is that students have the
right to challenge schools officials as long as they
remain subject to the district polices that prompted the
actions, Liberty Counsel maintains.
“After ten years and three appeals, Antonio deserves an
answer to the question of whether the school district
violated his constitutional rights,” said Mathew D.
Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel and dean
of Liberty University School of Law, in a statement
Thursday.
“The Second Circuit skirted the issue, and we are asking
the Supreme Court to give Antonio the chance to get that
answer.”
Liberty Counsel first filed the case on behalf of
Antonio and his mother in 1999. Antonio is now in high
school.
When Antonio was in kindergarten, he drew a poster with
several religious figures with the words, “The only way
to save the world” for an art project about the
environment. Liberty Counsel said Antonio meant to say
that God is the only way to save the environment.
The teacher at his New York public school rejected the
poster because of its religious message and told Antonio
to make another poster.
In the second poster, Antonio drew children holding
hands around the globe, people recycling trash, and
children picking up garbage. On the other said he drew a
figure of a bearded man wearing a robe that was kneeling
on the ground with hands stretched toward the sky. The
figure is not identified in the drawing, but Antonio
said the man is Jesus.
The teacher allowed the poster to be displayed on the
cafeteria wall but hid the Jesus image.
“Despite the federal guidelines on religion in public
schools recognizing that students may include religious
theme in assignments, school officials insisted on
folding Antonio Peck’s poster in half to hide the figure
they interpreted to be Jesus,” Staver said.
Over the past ten years, the Second Circuit Court of
Appeals has twice reversed the decision of New York
federal judge Norman Mordue who ruled that the public
school officials had the right to censor the poster. The
third time, however, the appeals court decided that
Antonio was no longer entitled to challenge the
district’s action because there was no reasonable
expectation that his work would be censored again.
But Liberty Counsel pointed out that school officials
said they censored the drawing of Jesus because they
were concerned that adults might see the image and think
the school was teaching religion. The legal group argues
that the concern about how adults would react to a
student’s work remains relevant throughout a student’s
academic career and thus Antonio still has a legitimate
reason to challenge the school district.
The case is known as Antonio Peck v. Baldwinsville
Central School District. (Jennifer Riley, Christian Post
Reporter)
|