Khandamal, a blot on Indian
Secularism:
Publisher: Media House, Mayur Vihar Phase 1, New Delhi
110091.
Pages 128.
The
ultimate tragedy is not the oppressi on and cruelty by
the bad people but the silence over that by the good
people.”
It was martin Luther King Jr who said so. When he said
so, he was speaking a truth about democracies.
Democracy, in many instances deteriorates into
majoritarianism. Oppression and injustice are thus born.
Kandhamal, a blot on Indian secularism by Anto Akkara
can as well be titled ' a blot on Indian democracy.’
Democracy presupposes the rule of law and it was
replaced by the law of the jungle for months together in
Kandhamal, in what can be termed as one of the darkest
periods in the history of Indian democracy.
Democracy is a philosophy that has emerged with the
civilization of man. It results from a political
recognition that a majority in any nation is bound to
trample upon the minorities without checks and balances.
The court, the police and the legislature and the media
are supposed to strengthen these checks and balances by
their proper functioning.
Kandhamal is only the latest instance to indicate that
we are yet to evolve out of the barbarian culture of
'might is right' The demolition of the Babri Masjid ,
the anti-Sikh riots in the wake of the later prime
minister Indira Gandhi and the massacre of Muslims
continue to indict the good people with a conscience.
The majority of the people of this land believes that
the above instances constituted gross injustices. They
have no sympathy with the marauders who went about
looting , burning and killing people unchecked in Orissa.
And for no other reason than that the victims worshipped
a different God. Nothing short of insanity.
While the communal minded fanatics spewed venom and
hatred, initiating the looting and murder, the law and
order machinery in Orissa looked the other way; the
Centre then ruled by the United Progressive Alliance
watched shamelessly.
There is a significant sentence in the book by Akkara
explaining what made Kandhamal possible. There is no
lack of brute force with the government to control the
brutes who were at large in society? We have a mighty
army and air force kept in readiness to meet any
external threat.
It was a lack of will. It was simply a concern for
votes. The fanatics belonged to the fringe of the
majority community and hence could not be touched.
Akkara writes: “Realising this danger of ;committing
political suicide , UPA government despite its professed
commitment to secularism decided to be pragmatic than
righteous in refusing to step on the Kandhamal
landmine.”
Perhaps some details of gruesome events, described in
this book, have already appeared in newspapers. Perhaps
some stories of unutterable; humiliation might have even
escaped his attention. But he has been able to record
the travails of a people whose cry in the wilderness
went unheard for a long whileas long as the atrocities
lasted.
Even now there is a threat to witnesses, who are willing
to stand before courts to testify to the deeds of
murders and looters. Vested interests might seek to deny
the victims full scale compensation for all the
destroyed property. It is good Christian lawyers have
come forward to provide legal aid to the victims. But
who will provide them the courage to stand for the
truth? That is an eternal issue with Indian democracy.
But there is hope. In the recent general elections, the
people indicated through their verdict that they are not
with the wicked. The Congress party must recognize even
belatedly that soft Hindutva will not pay them dividends
as the youth of the land get educated and come out of
their traditional moorings of blind faith in the past.
The Modis, Togadias and Advanis wear the masks of
nationalism and patriotism to beguile the majority.
India is waking up to questions of justice and
righteousness. The tantriks take note. They may lament
English education because it lifts up the clouds of
ignorance and superstition from young minds. There is
hope despite Kandhamal.
What should be the strategy for the minorities for
living in peace in this land? How do we make this land
safe for justice and righteousness? By being in leaguer
with the majority who believe in these values and
helping to isolate the fanatical fringe.
Commenting recently on the Liberhan commission report, a
leading supreme court lawyer, Rajeev Dhavan wrote:
'December 6, 1992 sends a chilling message that lumpen
Hindus provoked by the Sangh Parivar can always
terrorise any community or destroy their mosques,
churches, holy places with total impunity. After Babri
Masjid fell. There were no-holds- barred.
No one could touch these marauders. Photographs
identifying the miscreants were available, but they were
not ferreted out.'
Such saner voices are not scarce in the majority
community. Their hands must be strengthened to fight
corruption, communalism and injustice in this land. The
minorities must play an active role in supporting such
voices of conscience. Akkara's book must be passed on to
the right thinking people of the majority community so
that they may know what horrors were committed by their
own brethren in the name of religion which calls for
tolerance and co-existence.
We must remember Kandhamal because what happened to the
innocents in Orissa could happen to anyone elsewhere if
evil men could have their way. The majority also
consists of minority subsects and a Togadia or Modi
championing the narrow cause of any could lead to
bloodshed and atrocities. They must be checked.
More such books should come out to expose wickedness and
to expose the condemnable silence of the majority on
issues of right and wrong. More people should write to
arouse the conscience of this nation. Akkara did well.
His labour is not in vain. Elie Wiesel , Nobel prize
winning Jewish leader, had this comment on why he wrote
on the holocaust: 'My goal is always the same: to invoke
the past as a shield for the future; to show the
invisible world of yesterday and through it, perhaps on
it, erect amoral world where men are not victims and
children never starve and run in fear.'
We too must remember the past and prevent crimes of the
future.
|