PRAISE THE ALMIGHTY ONLINE

RNI No. 72289/99 Registered No. DL(S)-17/3138/2006-2009 dt.04-12-2008   

JULY 16-30, 2009

   Home             About us                   Subscribe to the Print Edition            Archives             Contact us
   
 

NEWS & EVENTS

    Delhi/NCR
    National
    World
 

FEATURES

    Editorial
    Be Aware
    Focus
    Young India
    Science Track
    Ten Years Celebrations PhotoGallery
    Blossoming Buds
    The Suffering Body of Christ
    Letters to the Editor
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
 RELIGIOUS ROW GOES TO THE PRESIDENT
 

KOLKATA: India's ruling party has intervened in a bid to block a move by one of the country's states to make it more difficult to change religions.

The Congress Party has advised the country's president, Pratibha Patil, not to sign on Madhya Pradesh's amendment to a freedom of religion act that would make anyone in the state wanting to convert to seek permission from the local administrative authority and police.

Christian leaders say the proposal in the state ruled by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), a Hindu nationalist party, largely aims to curb conversion to Christianity by the state's animists, who believe that souls or spirits exist not only in humans and animals but also in plants and rocks.

Religious conversion is a sensitive issue in Hindu-majority India, where Christian missionaries have been accused by the BJP of "forcing" Hindus to convert.

Local media reported last week that as the Madhya Pradesh governor forwarded the bill to Ms Patil's predecessor for approval.

No action was taken until recently when the home ministry advised her not to sign it, claiming the amendment could be misused to harass people. Mrs Patil is yet to act on the amendment.

The original Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act 1968 makes it mandatory for a new convert to file a legal affidavit to the administrative authority declaring that he or she was not under any pressure to convert.

The amendment says a conversion (read 'baptism') can take place only after the district magistrate gives permission, and the local police chief certifies that no force is involved in the proposed conversion, as if the common man in India is bereft of all powers of discernment! It was passed by the state's assembly in 2006 and sent to the president in 2007. The country's solicitor general, Goolam E Vahanvati, said at the time the amendment did not conform with India's constitution.

Local media have reported the home minister, P Chidambaram, who is known for his secular views, is behind the Congress Party's move against the amendment.

In the states of Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh and Gujarat, laws preventing forced conversion are in place and anyone found violating them can face up to three years in jail and a fine.

In Karnataka, where the BJP-led government recently came to power, a similar amendment to the one proposed in Madhya Pradesh is to be adopted if the president approves it.

Christian leaders in Madhya Pradesh say they had been worried about the amendment and are happy the home office has intervened.

"If the amendments turned into law it was going to have a terrible effect on minority Christians, with countless innocent ordinary Christians and church workers facing longer jail terms and other harassments," Anand Muttungal, the spokesman for the Catholic Bishop's Council of Madhya Pradesh, said.

"Christians are already a persecuted community in Madhya Pradesh. In the past 10 years hundreds of church workers were arrested on charges of forcible conversion. In many cases they were beaten up by Hindu activists before being handed over to police. Interestingly, in all cases the court found the church workers innocent, but in many cases they had to spend months in jail," he said.

John Dayal, the secretary general of All India Christian Council, said the BJP often tries to empower police to make them act against pastors and church workers.

"It is quite obvious that the desire [to impose such laws] is to appease Hindutva sentiments and to empower district and local police and civil officials to curtail the freedom of faith of the local people," said Mr Dayal.

"Freedom of faith is a fundamental right, and government's permission is not required to pray singly or as a group in your own house or in a formal church building. Certainly, no prior permission is required to practise or change one's faith.

"The Indian Constitution gives us full rights to profess, practise and propagate our faith, and it gives the right to every citizen to chose or changes his religion.”
 


This page is updated on July 22, 2009

 

 
 
 


PRAISE THE ALMIGHTY
10 YEARS CELEBRATION

 

 

   

     
 

 

   


Make this your Home Page
© Copyright - Praise The Almighty 2009
Site last updated on: July 22, 2009. Powered by PalmCedar