|
LONDON, 5 Dec 2009 (AP)
The United Nations will conduct its own investigation
into e-mails leaked from a leading British climate
science center in addition to the probe by the
University of East Anglia, a senior U.N. climate
official said in comments broadcast Friday.
E-mails stolen from the climate unit at the University
of East Anglia appeared to show some of world's leading
scientists discussing ways to shield data from public
scrutiny and suppress others' work. Those who deny the
influence of man-made climate change have seized on the
correspondence to argue that scientists have been
conspiring to hide evidence about global warming.
In an interview with the BBC, the chairman of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Rajendra
Pachauri, said the issue raised by the e-mails was
serious and said "we will look into it in detail,"
"We will certainly go into the whole lot and then we
will take a position on it," he said. "We certainly
don't want to brush anything under the carpet."
The University of East Anglia has defended the integrity
of the science published by the climate unit and its
researchers, but on Thursday said it would investigate
whether some of the data had been fudged. Phil Jones,
the director of the unit, stepped down earlier in the
week pending the result of the investigation.
East Anglia said its review will examine the e-mails and
other information "to determine whether there is any
evidence of the manipulation or suppression of data
which is at odds with acceptable scientific practice."
The theft of the e-mails and their publication online —
only weeks before the U.N. summit on global warming —
has been politically explosive, even if researchers say
their content has no bearing on the principles of
climate change itself.
Virginia Burkett, chief scientist for global change
research at the U.S. Geological Survey, told The
Associated Press that, even if the data and studies
mentioned in the e-mail exchanges were ignored, the
evidence "is still hugely overwhelming in terms of the
rates of changes that can only be attributed to the
warming of the atmosphere. That includes melting Arctic
sea ice, glaciers and ice sheets, decline of spring snow
season, coral reef bleaching and earlier onset of spring
in plants and animals," she said, referring to changing
patterns of blooming, hibernation, and migration.
"They may be talking three or four datasets in the
e-mail scandal, we're looking at 28,000 data sets of
physical and biological systems from around the world,"
she said.
Nevertheless, Saudi Arabia's lead climate change
negotiator, Mohammad Al-Sabban, reportedly said the
e-mails would have a "huge impact" on the Copenhagen
talks on a new global emissions reduction pact scheduled
to begin Monday.
"It appears from the details of the scandal that there
is no relationship whatsoever between human activities
and climate change," Al-Sabban was quoted as saying by
the BBC Friday.
Britain's Ed Miliband, the climate change secretary,
acknowledged Friday that the revelations may have an
impact on the talks in Denmark. But he dismissed as
"flat Earth-ers" critics who claim the e-mails are proof
the case for man-made climate change is exaggerated.
"We need maximum transparency including about all the
data but it's also very, very important to say one chain
of e-mails, potentially misrepresented, does not undo
the global science," Miliband said. "I think we want to
send a very clear message to people about that."
Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives have
grilled government scientists on the leaked e-mails in a
hearing Wednesday in Washington, but the scientists
countered that the e-mails don't change the fact that
the Earth is warming.(By RAPHAEL G. SATTER)
|