PRAISE THE ALMIGHTY ONLINE

RNI No. 72289/99 Registered No. DL(S)-17/3138/2006-2009 dt.04-12-2008   

AUGUST 1-15, 2009

   Home             About us                   Subscribe to the Print Edition            Archives             Contact us
   
 

NEWS & EVENTS

    Delhi/NCR
    National
    World
 

FEATURES

    Editorial
    Be Aware
    Focus
    From the pulpit
    Young India
    Science Track
    Ten Years Celebrations PhotoGallery
    Blossoming Buds
    The Suffering Body of Christ
    Letters to the Editor

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
 GUJARAT 2002: MODI’S ROLE TO BE PROBED
 

NEW DELHI: The Gujarat High Court has refused to stay the probe by the special investigation team (SIT) — appointed by the Supreme Court to look at post-Godhra riot cases — into a complaint alleging the role of chief minister Narendra Modi, his Cabinet colleagues and senior administration and police officials in the 2002 communal carnage at Gulburg society in Ahmedabad.

Justice D H Vaghela on Friday dismissed the petition filed by former BJP MLA Kalu Malivad, one of the 76 accused in the case, stating that no relief could be granted in the case as the SIT was directly working under the supervision of the Supreme Court.

Mr Malivad had filed a petition in the Gujarat High Court demanding a stay on investigations by Supreme Court-appointed SIT with regard to a complaint made by Zakia Jaffrey, widow of ex-MP Ehsan Jaffrey who was killed during the rioting at Gulburg society along with 39 others. Zakia had alleged that Mr Modi and some of the ministers in the his Cabinet had, along with police officials and senior bureaucrats, aided and abetted the 2002 post-Godhra communal violence.

Mr Malivad, in his petition to the Gujarat High Court, argued that since no FIR was registered regarding the complaint made by Zakia, the SIT was not empowered to investigate the case as per the provisions of the CrPC. Citing these grounds, he demanded a stay on investigations and directions from the court to restrain SIT from arresting persons named in the complaint, including Mr Modi.

Appearing on behalf of the SIT, senior counsel K G Menon countered the points raised in Mr Malivad’s petition saying that their job, as per the Supreme Court order, was to find the truth in the allegations made by Zakia.

And as the apex court order had stated that SIT needs to take necessary steps as per law, “a preliminary inquiry in the matter was permissible, which we are doing,” Mr Menon informed the high court.

He further submitted that their report on the preliminary inquiry would be submitted to the apex court and only after it discloses a cognisable offence shall the SIT register a case and proceed for investigation.

In May this year, the SIT had filed an additional chargesheet in the Gulburg society case in the metropolitan court, naming a deputy SP-level officer, K G Erda, and seven others including local BJP leaders Bipin Patel and Chunilal Prajapati as accused.

Erda was posted as a police inspector at Meghaninagar police station during the 2002 post-Godhra riots when a mob had attacked Gulburg society. Gulburg society comes under the jurisdiction of Meghaninagar police station.

 


This page is updated on Aug 07, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 
 


PRAISE THE ALMIGHTY
10 YEARS CELEBRATION

 

 

   

 

   


Make this your Home Page
© Copyright - Praise The Almighty 2009
Site last updated on: Aug 07, 2009. Powered by PalmCedar