PRAISE THE ALMIGHTY ONLINE

RNI No. 72289/99 Registered No. DL(S)-17/3138/2006-2009 dt.04-12-2008   

APRIL 1-16, 2009

   Home             About us                   Subscribe to the Print Edition            Archives             Contact us
   
 

NEWS & EVENTS

    Delhi & NCR
    National
    World
 

FEATURES

    Editorial
    Be Aware
    From the pulpit
    In the spotlight
    Witness
    Ten Years Celebrations PhotoGallery
    Young India
    Blossoming Buds
    The Suffering Body of Christ
    Letters to the Editor
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
 INDIA OR 'HINDUSTAN': WHOSE LAND IS THIS ANYWAY?  - Philip P Eapen

Author's webpage: http://philip.eapen.googlepages.com

 
 
“Why are Hindu’s made to feel insecure in their own country?” “Why should Hindus apologise for being Hindus in their own country?” “Why are Hindus given a step-motherly treatment in their own country?

These are some of questions that I come across in the news media in response to media outrage against Varun Gandhi’s vitriolic hate speech. This is followed by a diatribe against Muslims and “their Mecca” and against Christians and “their Vatican.” This is how the Hindu fraternity in India lays claim on India as their “own” land—as if Indian citizens who follow other religions do not belong to India. This is how the Sangh Parivar and its sympathisers exclude followers of other faiths from their hearts and attempt to alienate them from a secular democratic republic of India.

Christians, Muslims, Parsis, Sikhs, and Jews of India belong to India. And India belongs to them as much as to the Hindus. It seems that Hindus of India someone how haven’t come to terms with this reality. They are not able to distinguish between today’s secular Republic of India and the “Hindustan” of old. In other words, they have not accepted the secular foundations of this modern republic.

If the Sangh Parivar had been designated with the task of writing the Constitution of India, they would have created a theocratic kingdom and christened it “The Hindu Kingdom of India.” They are sad that some Muslims took away a portion of “Hindustan” to create a theocratic state of Pakistan. And therefore, they are dreaming of an exclusive “Hindustan” where Christians and Muslims will have no place.

The Republic of India is not Hindustan. Modern India is home to several kinds of people who follow several religions and even atheism. Secular India should not be known by the name of any one religion. In my opinion, any one who uses the word “Hindustan” to refer to secular India is unwilling to accept the twist of history and guilty of alienating people of many religions from their land.

The minorities have so far borne a much larger share of the burden of nation-building than what their population demands. “Majority” Indians should not turn a blind eye to the contributions of these “minorities.” If Hindus continue to complain -”We pay our taxes and the minorities get all the concession” - let them not forget the selfless service that they have enjoyed at the hands of minority groups in the fields of eduction, social welfare and health care.

Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Jews, Zoroastrians, Bahais and Atheists of this land are proud of India. They work towards the advancement of modern secular India—not for the establishment of an ancient Hindustan.
 

This page is updated on April 1, 2009

 
 
 


PRAISE THE ALMIGHTY
10 YEARS CELEBRATION

 

 

   

     
 

 

   


Make this your Home Page
© Copyright - Praise The Almighty 2009
Site last updated on: April 1, 2009. Powered by PalmCedar